One Unified Global Perspective
Communications with a Global Perspective
Home
Intro
Contact Us
Voice over IP
PBX Solutions
Services
Support
Glossary
Open Source
Blog
Forum

WebMail





2009 Dec 06 - Sun

ToS/DSCP Cheat Sheet

On the Flow-Tools email list, Craig Weinhold published a cheat sheet for how to treat IP Packet ToS (Type of Service) bits:

**** Pre-1998

The IPv4 ToS byte was part of the original 1981 definition of Internet Protocol 
in RFC 791, which specified a 3-bit precedence value and 3-bits of ToS attributes. 
In the tables below, "tos" values refer to the entire byte. 
In 1992, RFC 1349 added a fourth ToS attribute. 

  0x80  0x40  0x20  0x10  0x08  0x04  0x02  0x01
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|     PRECEDENCE  |    TOS attributes     |  -  |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

         PRECEDENCE                     TOS attributes

name            dec tos bin     name              dec tos bin
network           7 224 111     min-delay           8  16 1000
internet          6 192 110     max-throughput      4   8 0100
critical          5 160 101     max-reliability     2   4 0010
flash-override    4 128 100     min-monetary-cost   1   2 0001
flash             3  96 011     normal              0   0 0000
immediate         2  64 010
priority          1  32 001
routine           0   0 000


**** Post-1998 

RFC 2474 reworked the ToS as a 6-bit Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) 
and, soon after, RFC 3168 allocated the lowest two bits for 
Error Congestion Notification (ECN, 
an IP analogy of frame-relay FECN and ATM EFCI). 

  0x80  0x40  0x20  0x10  0x08  0x04  0x02  0x01
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|                DSCP               |    ECN    |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

                        DSCP

name    dec tos binary      name    dec  tos binary
AF11    10   40 001010      CS1       8   32 001000
AF12    12   48 001100      CS2      16   64 010000
AF13    14   56 001110      CS3      24   96 011000
AF21    18   72 010010      CS4      32  128 100000
AF22    20   80 010100      CS5      40  160 101000
AF23    22   88 010110      CS6      48  192 110000
AF31    26  104 011010      CS7      56  224 111000 
AF32    28  112 011100      EF       46  184 101110
AF33    30  120 011110      default   0    0 000000
AF41    34  136 100010      
AF42    36  144 100100      AF = assured forwarding
AF43    38  152 100110      EF = expedited forwarding
                            CS = class selector

   ECN (unrelated to QoS)
   00   Not-ECT  Not ECN-Capable Transport
   01   ECT(0)   ECN-Capable Transport 
   10   ECT(1)   ECN-Capable Transport 
   11   CE       Congestion Experienced

**** Notes on interpreting the ToS byte

The two definitions are complimentary for the upper 3-bits. This is good, since those three bits are often copied to/from the 3-bit class-of-service (CoS) field of layer-2 802.1p frames and the 3-bit experimental (EXP) field of MPLS frames. Bits 3-5, however, are fairly incompatible..

Thus, it's important not to oversimplify precedence/DSCP as a simple pecking order. In reality, each unique precedence/DSCP value conveys a packet's requirements for throughput, latency, and packet loss, three traits that are somewhat at odds with each other. And, any value can be assigned to any organizationally-unique purposes. For example,

  • Packets with precedence 5 and/or DSCP EF are often serviced by priority queues, so they may delay packets with higher precedence/DSCP values.
  • Within each AF level (e.g., AF2x includes AF21, AF22, and AF23), the higher values indicate a higher tolerance to packet loss. I.e., a congested interface should drop AF22 packets earlier than AF21 packets. In Cisco IOS, this behavior is implemented with DiffServ-complaint WRED ('random-detect dscp' on a class-map).
  • Any DSCP value under CS6 can be assigned for any organizationally-unique use. For example, Precedence 1/DSCP CS1 is often assigned for use as a less-than-best-effort class called scavenger. To successfully implement the scavenger class, all network devices must agree to treat CS1 traffic worse than Precedence 0/DSCP default.

ECN (RFC 3168) is an emerging issue for traditional netflow collection and processing. The jist of ECN is that an intermediary router can, after sensing congestion, change the lower two bits of ToS to indicate congestion so that the hosts can slow themselves down. It's a L3 implementation of frame-relay FECN, essentially. Unfortunately, since the ToS field changes packet-to-packet and hop-to-hop, it also disrupts the traditional netflow 7-tuplet key (protocol, src/dst IP, src/dst port, ToS, input interface).

If you can, exclude ToS as a flow key on your netflow sources. Recent cisco IOS versions let you do this with flexible netflow while still exporting netflow v5.



New blog site at: Raymond Burkholder - What I Do

Blog Content ©2013
Ray Burkholder
All Rights Reserved
ray@oneunified.net
(441) 705-7292
(519) 838-6013
Available for Contract Work
Resume

RSS: Click to see the XML version of this web page.

twitter
View Ray 
Burkholder's profile on LinkedIn
technorati
Add to Technorati Favorites



December
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
   
6
   


Main Links:
Monitoring Server
SSH Tools
QuantDeveloper Code

Special Links:
Frink

Blog Links:
Sergey Solyanik
Marc Andreessen
Micro Persuasion
... Reasonable ...
Chris Donnan
BeyondVC
lifehacker
Trader Mike
Ticker Sense
HeadRush
TraderFeed
Stock Bandit
The Daily WTF
Guy Kawaski
J. Brant Arseneau
Steve Pavlina
Matt Cutts
Kevin Scaldeferri
Joel On Software
Quant Recruiter
Blosxom User Group
Wesner Moise
Julian Dunn
Steve Yegge
Max Dama

2009
Months
Dec




Mason HQ

Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise.