2008 Mar 21 - Fri
The ODF - OOXML Three Ring Circus
I've been following along with the standards-wannabe known as OOXML. Microsoft's want
this proprietary standard so much, you can feel the flames of hell leaping higher. Ok, so
my visual metaphors are getting out of hand. I recently did lighting for a sketch for
BMDS's production of GUMS, which in itself is
a series of comedic sketches. Anyway, the sketch of which I'm speaking is where the Devil,
played by Steve Watts, delivers a monologue about recent arrivals in Hell. For example, the
atheists are called a bunch of nitwits, the Christians are scoffed at due to the Jews being
right. Very few groups were left out. And I must say, my 'fires of hell' lighting worked
out quite well.
In reading various blogs and articles regarding Microsoft's process of stacking the
National Standards Bodies with Microsoft's influence peddlers and lackeys brings forth
strongly the image of "selling one's soul for something one believes in". But corporate
greed and monopolostic habits die hard. Even bending to the level of
personal slurs, with this not being the first documented one.
The Standards Blog sprouts forth a bright flower from the sewage of vitriol
currently being spouted regarding incomplete standards, lockins, patent protection, and
selfishness. He has exerpted comments from South African Minister of Public Service and
Administration Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi. I'll reprint them here as representing a voice
calling out from the desert:
...This past year has been marked by a raising in the tension between the traditional
incumbent monopoly software players and the rising champions of the Free Software movement
in Africa. The flashpoints of conflict have been particularly marked around the development
and adoption of open standards and growing concerns about software patents..
It is unfortunate that the leading vendor of office software, which enjoys considerable
dominance in the market, chose not to participate and support ODF in its products, but
rather to develop its own competing document standard which is now also awaiting judgement
in the ISO process. If it is successful, it is difficult to see how consumers will benefit
from these two overlapping ISO standards. I would like to appeal to vendors to listen to the
demands of consumers as well as Free Software developers. Please work together to produce
interoperable document standards. The proliferation of multiple standards in this space is
confusing and costly..
An issue which poses a significant threat to the growth of an African software
development
sector (both Free Software and proprietary) is the recent pressure by certain multinational
companies to file software patents in our national and regional patent offices. Whereas open
standards and Free Software are intended to be inclusive and encourage fair competition,
patents are exclusive and anti-competitive in their nature. Whereas there are some
industries in which the temporary monopoly granted by a patent may be justified on the
grounds of encouraging innovation, there is no reason to believe that society benefits from
such monopolies being granted for computer program .inventions.. The continued growth in the
quantity and quality of Free Software illustrates that such protection is not required to
drive innovation in software. Indeed all of the current so-called developed countries built
up their considerable software industries in the absence of patent protection for software.
For those same countries to insist on patent protection for software now is simply to place
protectionist barriers in front of new comers. As the economist, Ha-Joon Chang, observed:
having reached the top of the pile themselves they now wish to kick away the ladder.
African software developers have enough barriers to entry as it is, without the introduction
of artificial restrictions on what programs they are and aren.t allowed to write. When
Steven Biko wrote .I write what I like. he was not referring to computer programs but it
would certainly be an apt motto for today.s generation of African Free Software developers.
It will become increasingly important for FOSSFA to continue to lobby and mobilize to keep
this intellectual space open.
One cannot be in Dakar without being painfully aware of the tragic history of the slave
trade. For three hundred years, the Maison des Esclaves (Slave House) on Gorée Island, was a
hub in the system of forceful transportation of Africans as slaves to the plantations of the
West Indies and the southern states of America. Over the same period people were being
brought as slaves from the Malay Archipelago and elsewhere to South Africa. The institution
of slavery played such a fundamental role in the early development of our current global
economy, that by the end of the 18th century, the slave trade was a dominant factor in the
globalised system of trade of the day.
As we find ourselves today in this new era of the globalised Knowledge Economy there are
lessons we can and must draw from that earlier era. That a crime against humanity of such
monstrous proportions was justified by the need to uphold the property rights of slave
owners and traders should certainly make us more than a little cautious about what should
and should not be considered suitable for protection as property..
Her comments are far ranging, but for me being a software developer, being sued for
creating a smiley face that has already been patented is not my idea of a good time... as an
example.
We do
need a reality check regarding patents on software. We do have good corporate citizens like
IBM who build real products, and obtain real patents, and make real money. Yes, I know
there is dirt under the carpet over there, but still, with over 100,000 employees, they must
be doing something correct.
Here's hoping that Microsoft will somehow get its comeupance regarding bullying a
6000 page incomplete document through what was, at one point in time, a relatively
decent standards process.
[/Personal/Technology]
permanent link
|